Before book dating fell jerusalem revelation feltish ladies

Consider one of the most amazing prophecies in all of Scripture.

Jesus is leaving the temple when his disciples call his attention to its buildings.

An entire category of internal evidence surrounds the assertion that the Beast of Revelation (Rev. At least three aspects of the life of Nero are said to be found in John’s description of the Beast: First , Nero’s persecution of Christians (Rev. 13:7 ); Second , the myth that after his death Nero would come to life again (cf. The problem is with the first part of the statement. “ The twenty-fifth year of the captivity, and the fourteenth year after the city was smitten, i.e., taken and reduced to ashes, are the year 575 before Christ.”— Carl Friedrich Keil and Franz Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002), Eze. Mark Hitchcock, “ The Stake in the Heart— The A. 95 Date of Revelation,” in Tim La Haye and Thomas Ice, eds., The End Times Controversy (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 2003), 140.

singapore dating union - Before book dating fell jerusalem revelation

If Revelation was written before AD 70, it is reasonable to assume that the vision given to John was meant to reveal the apocalyptic events surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem—events that were still in John’s future but are in our past.

This, of course, does not presuppose that all the prophecies in Revelation have already been fulfilled.

Aspects of the text of the book of Revelation have been understood by some as being indicative of an earlier date. The angel Gabriel told Daniel that the “seventy weeks” were to end with the destruction of Jerusalem (Dan. -27); and that period would also serve to “seal up the vision and prophecy” (Dan. [emphasis added] We concur with Chilton’s basic premise: prophecy and vision will be sealed up at the conclusion of the 70 weeks of Daniel. This is the interpretive equivalent of “two wrongs don’t make a right.” Here is revealed another Achilles heel of reliance upon internal evidence: it is too easily subject to cross-correlation which seems supportive, but is not necessarily related.

Chilton holds that since Scripture teaches that all prophecy would be complete by the end of the 70th week of Daniel (Dan. -27) and since the book of Revelation contains prophetic material, therefore the book must have been written prior to the end of Daniel’s 70th week: We have a priori teaching from Scripture itself that all special revelation ended by A. But Chilton assumes the 70th week is completed with the destruction of Jerusalem in A. Chilton misinterprets the meaning of a passage in Daniel to “prove” his interpretation of John’s passage, but both interpretations are in error. it seems highly improbable that a book so full of liturgical allusions as the book of Revelation—and these, many of them, not too great or important points, but to minutia—could have been written by any other than a priest, and one who had at one time been in actual service in the Temple itself, and thus become so intimately conversant with its details, that they came to him naturally, as part of the imagery he employed. 48:1, Ezekiel, like John, receives a vision of a Temple that, if taken literally, has never existed up to this day.

In summary, among the reasons we can be certain that the book of Revelation was not written twenty-five years after the destruction of Jerusalem, three tower above the rest.

Last modified 31-May-2018 18:41